In progress
DNR (deed not recognized) setup

I believe a setup is in progress (January 21, 2015) if not already done, that makes it appear that our family agree with the 1992 Deed for the Trust property not being recognized as a deed for approximately 22 years. and not explaining why.

The Buyer’s 2013 sales contract for the Trust property does not mention the 1992 Deed for the Trust property. This automatically creates a title problem. This is the point where the wrong is created. The Buyer did this. Our family did not do this.

The Buyer’s sales contract contain numerous clauses about “title objections” as if a title problem were expected. Not mentioning the 1992 Deed for the Trust property in a sales contract for the Trust property automatically creates a title problem.

Is the intent of the “title objections” to make it appear that not recognizing the 1992 Deed for the Trust since 1992 is some ambiguous legal problem that our family is responsible for settling? Is this a lose or lose choice?

(1) If I object to the 1992 Deed not being recognized would it be prudent to expect that those in control would agree with me after they have not recognized it for approximately 22 years?

(2) If I don’t object to the 1992 Deed not being recognizing would that be made to appear as my agreeing to it by default?

The B&K law firm who says they represent Jean Nader, had Jean Nader sign this sales contract. This is wrong. The only thing Jean Nader did wrong was to trust  those who are held out to the public as to be automatically trusted. The B&K law firm did this. Our family did not do this.

The 1992 Deed should be recognized. But the Buyer and the B&K law firm have a document, the 2013 sales contract, signed by Jean Nader that does not recognize the 1992 Deed. What should be Chief Judge Dennis J. Smith's responsibility is planted between members of our family (Anthony O'Connell and Jean  Nader). Using the family as cover is a pattern. History suggests that Chief Judge Dennis J. Smith may have something put in the Court records  approving what Jean Nader is led to do, such as not recognizing the 1992 Deed at bk8307p1446.

If the powers that be can make this deed not be recognized I believe they can make any deed not be recognized if one member of their group trusts the type of things Jean Nader was told.